A buyer asks for evidence
You need to explain how your AI works, what controls are in place and what your documentation supports.
Know what to fix before a buyer review or EU launch. We review your AI product’s technical controls and evidence, then give your engineers a prioritized action plan.
Start with your product URL and the reason for the review. No source code needed and no commitment to a paid audit.
For teams with an AI product and a concrete compliance question, buyer review or launch requirement.
You need to explain how your AI works, what controls are in place and what your documentation supports.
You need a technical readiness review against the EU AI Act requirements identified as relevant to your product.
Your engineering team needs to understand the missing controls, evidence and implementation work.
A product-specific technical review, written findings and a plan your team can implement. We agree which requirements, controls and evidence are in scope before work begins.
A review of the AI features, model providers, integrations and data flows in scope, with assumptions to confirm with your legal team.
Checks of the agreed controls, such as user disclosures, human approval, access permissions and sensitive-data handling. We record the evidence and what is missing.
A record of the scope, evidence reviewed, findings and limitations, so your product, engineering and legal teams can work from the same facts.
Practical remediation tasks and a walkthrough with your team. If you need help implementing changes, we can scope that work separately.
Our development work includes LLM applications, semantic search and connected AI assistants. These are engineering projects, not compliance-audit case studies.
We built a platform with natural-language search, vector retrieval and LLM-assisted ranking, using FastAPI and PostgreSQL with pgvector.
This work involves the data flows, model outputs and application logic that technical reviews need to examine.
Read the search platform case studyWe built an e-commerce assistant that uses structured breed and product data to recommend harness sizes, with n8n workflows for lead and chat-data exports.
This work connects AI responses, customer inputs, business rules and downstream integrations.
Read the SakerCanine case studyIllustrative example, not a client result
The documented workflow requires approval before a CRM update, but the AI agent can write without it.
The workflow specification requires approval. A test trace shows an update with no approval event recorded.
Enforce approval before writes, narrow the agent’s permissions and retest approved and rejected requests.
Agree a focused scope before committing to a larger review
Share your product URL and what prompted the review. We clarify the task and propose a scope, fee and timeline. Paid work starts only after you agree.
We assess the agreed technical controls and documentation, record findings and identify evidence that is missing.
You receive the report and prioritized action plan. We discuss them with your team. Implementation, if needed, is quoted separately.
Tell us what your AI product does and what prompted the review. We’ll discuss what needs checking and agree the scope, fee and timeline before paid work begins.
Technical assessment, not legal advice or certification